Several African countries are celebrating their 51 years of independence from colonial rule this year. We can count 16: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Madagascar, Mail, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Somalia and Togo (Chung, 2011). However, no other country may elicit the sort of interest that will be accorded to  Nigeria, during what is termed the golden jubilee celebration. This is not because of the earlier squabbling over the cost of the ceremonies, but perhaps due to the sheer size of Nigeria in terms of population or human and material resources, as Africa’s most populous country and containing may of the resources found in other African countries. At independence on the first of October in 1960, there was great expectation of the emergence of a great modern state in Africa called Nigeria.

It is therefore quite appropriate and even imperative to assess the journey of this country so far, as it celebrates 51 years of political independence and also look at the challenges and prospects of development after five decades.
A historical and political economy approach has been employed for this analysis, mainly because it helps in periodization of developments but perhaps more because it enhances a comparative approach that also enables bench-marking and performance evaluation concerning critical development indicators and possibilities.
The idea of assessment of success is very important, just as the comparative approach, within the African continent, among states in the developing countries and with the rest of the world. In the era of globalism, the interconnectedness of the world presupposes that if you are not looking at the corner of your world from the perspective of globalization, you can at least look at it from the framework of glocalization.

Also, in terms of political economy, there are those critical scholars who would even suggest that it does not need to be separated from history. In aligning with this epistemological tradition, therefore, this paper will discuss Nigeria’s development challenges and prospects from a critical social analytical political economy approach.
This will also, hopefully, establish the imperialist and post-imperialist contexts (probably different phases of globalization) of understanding the issues. Based on oral tradition, written sources, archaeology, geographical materials, ethnographic materials or linguistic materials, it has been established that the earliest contacts between the present area of Nigeria and the rest of the world may have commenced around the seventh century.

This was due the Trans-Saharan trade between the northern parts of Nigeria and the western Sudan, Sahara, North Africa, Europe, the Nile Valley including Egypt and the Middle East. This commercial intercourse was to later receive augmentation with the spread of Islam, especially in the Chad Basin. This would result in the conversion of Humai, the King of Kanem, herald the conscious development of Islam in the kingdoms in the region, including Hausa land right to the end of the 18th century. (Falola et al, 1999). The Trans-Saharan trade fuelled by Islam became a prominent feature of the political economy of northern Nigeria, based also on some concomitant factors:

“The most important of these factors were the introduction of camel (sic) to North Africa, the increases in demand for gold in Muslim countries and Europe, the role of Islam, the emergence of centralized state systems in the Nigeria area and other parts of West Africa, the Islamization of their rulers and the performance of annual pilgrimages by, especially, the rulers and the subsequent diplomatic activities which issued from them.” ( Falola et al, 1999 :58).

Along the coast, the Portuguese were the first international (European) visitors, having made contact with the Ijaws or Izon or Ijo as early as the 15th century and initiated the procurement of slaves. Benin historians reported that one Joao Affonso d’ Aviro, a Portuguese national, was the first European to visit a Nigerian town. His 1486 visit to Benin was a herald to what would come to significantly shape the future of what emerged as the modern state of Nigeria ( Falola et al. , 1999).
With a combination of interests-mercantilist, colonial acquisition and missionary work, the Europeans would come to substantially determine the history of the peoples of present day Nigeria. According to some of the most authoritative historians on Nigeria, the country was a creation of European ambitions and rivalries in West Africa as part of the “scramble for Africa” leading to its partition. In the area of Nigeria, the contestants were mainly the British, French, German and Portuguese. And it was created within territory that once had great kingdoms and states like the Kanem–Borno, the Sokoto Caliphate, Ife, Benin,  the Oyo  Empire, city states of the  Niger Delta and civilizations like  those of Aro  or the Igbo Ukwu and Nok  ( Falola et. al. , 1999; Crowder, 1965).  The conquest of Nigeria, Crowder has added, was effected through three centres of British interest in the territory: one, trading in Lagos; two, competition for palm oil in the Niger Delta; and three, trade in the hinterland through the River Niger.

Tamuno (1984) has affirmed that from 1899, that is after the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885, the British sought to establish and control a colonial state by removing all African opposition to this project. By 1914, Britain had become the paramount ruler of most of Nigeria, with the exception of pockets of resistance from Egbaland, Igbo and Tiv areas.

This historical sketch cannot be complete without recognizing the role of explorers, traders, missionaries and colonial administrators. Of these, George Goldie and Frederick Lugard, stand out. The former for expediting trade in the area of Nigeria under the United Africa Company (UAC), later Royal Niger Company (RNC), and the latter for consolidating colonial conquest. The important explorers were Mungo Park, the trio of Walter Dudley, Dixon Denham and Hugh Clapperton.There was another trio of James Richardson, Adolf Overweg and Heinrich Barth, and the Lander brothers, John and Richard. Much of the colonial history of Nigeria between 1914 to 1960 was social and political engineering to advance British interests, contain the “natives” and engage the nationalist movement which would compel independence in 1960.
British colonial administration was based mainly on indirect rule through African rulers, as distinct from the mainly French, assimilation policy of trying to make colonial subjects like French citizens and practised also by the Portuguese; and the German and Belgian paternalism which looked down on colonial subjects as if they were children. It could be suggested that the character of colonial socialization has left permanent imprints on former colonial communities as discussed by Aime Cesaire, Frantz Fanon, Kwame Nkrumah, Walter Rodney, Eric Williams and others. The “authenticite” and African personality anti-colonial reactions were apparently targeted at these influences.

Prior to assessing the performance of Nigeria in terms of development since 1960, from the perspective of challenges and prospects, there are still some important historical milestones to note: Nigeria gained independence in 1960 and became a republic in 1963. At birth, Nigeria was imbued with certain structural imbalances. The first post- colonial general elections were organized in 1964 and due to the turbulence surrounding those elections, largely in the opposition Tiv area of central Nigeria and the Yoruba area in the west, the military intervened in a coup d’état in 1966 in which the Prime Minister, Tafawa Balewa, from northern Nigeria, the northern premier Ahmadu Bello, the western premier, Samuel Ladoke Akintola, and several political leaders and military officers were killed.

The ethnically  and regionally skewed killings by mainly Igbo-speaking  officers, would attract a counter coup in the same year and the killing of the Igbo- speaking  Supreme Commander of the Armed  Forces and Head of State, Aguiyi Ironsi , to be replaced by Yakubu Gowon, a minority, from central Nigeria. The social turmoil and violence accompanying all these developments, led to the secessionist attempt by the eastern region to declare the state of Biafra and a resultant civil war of 30 months that claimed about one million lives. This development could be interpreted as a macabre culmination of ethnic and regional political rivalries, essentially driven by the elite, eager to manipulate social differences for personal gain.
Meanwhile, the largely  agrarian and solid minerals  economy  of Nigeria (cocoa, groundnut, palm products, hides and skins, rubber, and various food products like cassava, yams, guinea corn, maize, and citrus fruits, as well as coal, tin and columbite, iron, limestone , among others) from the pre-colonial up to  the colonial period,  was to  change into a gradually  monocultural economy based on hydrocarbons, with the discovery  of oil  at Oloibiri in  the Niger Delta in 1956. The events from the first military coup d’état, the earlier discovery of oil and the civil war, are very important aspects of Nigeria’s history. For it is possible to suggest that these developments significantly and critically correlate with the challenges and prospects of Nigeria’s development since independence as discussed in the edited volume by Panter-Brick (1978).

Out of Nigeria’s 51 years of independence, the military would rule Nigeria for about 30 years and come to largely shape the socio-economy and politics of the country. Military rule would destroy democratic structures and processes and negate consensual or participatory development for a long period. For purposes of brevity, the highlights of Nigeria’s national history from 1914 to 2011 are presented in Box 1:

Highlights of Nigeria’s National History, 1914 – 2011

Year Event
1914-1960 British Governors-General rule Nigeria
1960 Nigeria gains independence
1963 First military coup by Maj Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu
1966 Counter coup by Lt. Col. Yakubu Gowon
1967 Nigerian civil war starts
1967 Gowon divides four region into 12 states
1970 Nigerian civil war ends
1972 Nigeria changes currency from Pound to Naira, introduces metric system
1973 Nigeria switches from left to right-hand driving
1973 Nigeria hosts all Africa Games
1973 Nigeria inaugurates National Youth Service Corps
1974 Gowon reneges on planned handover in 1976
1975 Birth of Economic Community of West African States
1975 Murtala Muhammed topples Gowon in military coup
1976 Murtala Muhammed increases states to 19
1976 Murtala Muhammed killed in a failed military coup, Olusegun Obasanjo takes over
1977 Nigeria hosts 2nd Black and African Festival of Arts and Culture
1979 Obasanjo Hands over power to Shehu Shagari, Second Republic begins
1980 Nigeria hosts and wins African Nations Cup, 1st time
1983 Gen. Muhammadu Buhari topples Shagari in a coup
1985 Gen. Ibrahim Babangida ousts Buhari in military putsch
1985 Nigerian wins 1st global soccer title (U-16 FIF/KODAK)
1987 Failed military coup led by Maj. Gen Mamman Vatsa
1987 Gen Ibrahim Babangida increases states to 21
1990 Failed military coup led by Maj. Gideon Orkar
1990 Nigeria spearheads formation of ECOMOG
1991 Ibrahim Babangida creates 9 more states, totalling 30
1993 Babangida reneges on hangover plan, cancels polls
1993 Ernest Shonekan assumes office as interim head of state
1993 Gen Sani Abacha seizes power from Shonekan
1995 Commonwealth  sanctions  Nigeria
1995 Government announces aborted ‘coup’ against Abacha
1996 Abacha increases states to 36
1996 Nigeria wins 1st Olympic gold in long jump soccer
1998 Abacha dies, Abdusalami Abubakar assumes office as head of state
1999 Abdusalami cedes power to Olusegun Obasanjo: elected
1999 Nigeria hosts world youth soccer championship
2000 Nigeria co-hosts African Nations Cup with Ghana
2001 Olusegun Obasanjo and other African leaders form NEPAD
2003 President Obasanjo’s PDP wins parliamentary majority
2003 Nigeria’s 1st satellite, NigeriaSat-1, launched by Russian rocket
2006 President Obasanjo pays off Nigeria’s foreign debts
2007 Umaru Yar’Adua of the ruling PDP is elected
2011 Umaru Yar’Adua dies. His Vice President, Goodluck Jonathan becomes President

Source: The New Nigeria, 1960-2011, Golden Jubilee Edition, Nigeria High Commission, Ottawa, Canada

In terms of general characterization, the parliamentary system of government inherited from the British was discarded for an American-style presidential system in 1979. In addition,  the earlier military administration  of Yakubu Gowon  and Murtala  Muhammad embraced nationalist  policies and planned development through  fairly  well conceived  national  development plans.  The later military rulers especially the Ibrahim Babangida period, opted for Bretton Woods institutions’ (World Bank/International Monetary Fund) neo-classical economics or neo-liberal ideological paradigms, despite well meaning programs targeted at social engineering for development, moral development, poor people’s empowerment and the likes.
Thus far, there has been an observation of Nigeria’s domestic attributes. However, what has been the position of Nigeria in the global society? Emeka Anyaoku (2011), a Nigerian citizen and former Secretary-General of the Commonwealth, recently provided a useful synopsis of this position as follows:
In anticipation of Nigeria emerging as a big African country and leader of the black race, the country was unanimously accepted as the 99th member of the United Nations (UN) in October 1960. An offer Nigeria reciprocated by offering the contribution of a military contingent to the UN peace mission in the Congo, further leading to the appointment of Nigeria’s Brigadier Aguiyi  Ironsi, as the first African commander of the force in Congo.

Nigeria would later lead the 22-member Monrovia Group of African countries to merge with the Casablanca Group of five to form the OAU. Nigeria’s support to the liberation movements in Africa in the late 1970s, including Murtala Muhammed’s “Africa Has Come of Age” speech in Addis Ababa on 11th January, 1976 and its leading role in the formation of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in 1975. Other high points have been international peacekeeping roles including that of the ECOWAS Monitoring Group (ECOMOG) in Liberia and Sierra Leone, and the Paris Club’s debt forgiveness of 2005, among other actions, have helped  Nigeria’s international image. Mention must also be made of the appointment of a Nigerian as Secretary-General of the Commonwealth and Nigeria’s role in initiating the New Partnership for Africa Development (NEPAD). Another noteworthy positive aspect has been the success of a few Nigerians in the diaspora.

Nigeria’s low points have included a high crime rate in the same diaspora like various forms of fraud and drug trade, a faulty electoral process, and corruption. Another source of Nigeria’s bad image has been communal conflicts, militancy in the Niger Delta, religious riots and the Christmas 2009 incident of a Nigerian arrested for allegedly attempting to bomb an American airline. The country’s main weakness, however seems to be its underperformance despite bounteous resources, leading to the appellation of “resource curse” particularly for hydrocarbons, but which could also apply to other resources.

On  the basis of the domestic  and international perceptions of Nigeria as  a country which is generally poorly compared with other major  African countries or developing countries  like Singapore , Indonesia or Malaysia , but should actually be aspiring to be like  China or India, there are 15 critical areas of concern:
One, basic infrastructure and social services which are taken for granted in many countries are pitiably bad or weak in Nigeria.
Two, the factors and conditions of production, particularly land, capital, infrastructure and services are very difficult to access thus leading to de-industrialization and the failure of manufacturing. This means that economic facilities are weak.
Three, the educational system apart from being a poor social service, lacks quality, proper orientation and quantity.
Four, the healthcare delivery system at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels destroys rather than saves lives. The phenomenon of bourgeois medicine has substantially commodified  healthcare.
Five, agriculture, the highest contributor to Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at 40 percent and the highest employer of labour at 60 percent is underdeveloped through neglect and poor policy administration.
Six, the extraction, production and sale of the hydrocarbons of oil and gas, the highest foreign exchange earners, have been mismanaged, negatively politicized and corrupted. Much of gas is wasted through flaring.
Seven, there is phenomenal corruption at the level of politics and governance. The political class is unimaginably corrupt as well as the public bureaucracy which is also corrupt and ineffective in service delivery. The electoral process is an embarrassment and a threat to national survival. This negatively affects political freedom, transparency, guarantees and social opportunities. There is an additional challenge of making the federal system work for national unity rather than promote irredentism. In other words, there is a national question to be addressed, which has recently visibly manifested as the debate on rotation and zoning of political offices.
Eight, solid minerals which exist in abundance have been neglected or abandoned. Prior to the discovery of hydrocarbons, agriculture and solid minerals sustained the Nigerian economy.
Nine, ethics and values which are the moral guides and glue of society have crashed to a level of negative transcendentalism, normlessness and criminality. The reward-punishment system is weak and there is high moral decadence.
Ten, peace, social and protective security are perennially threatened at the societal  and individual levels, due to a combination of identifiable  social, economic, and political factors, one of which is elite manipulation of socio-cultural differences or violence induced by politicians. Another is poor policing.
Eleven, foreign policy lacks clarity and Nigeria has a very bad international image, often reflecting the failures at home.
Twelve, the mass media have enjoyed a boom due to liberalization and advances in technology and a large audience, but this has been accompanied by poor standards and quality, and low ethics. This includes the much celebrated and reportedly globally third ranked Nollywood movie industry.
Fourteen, women are badly excluded from the mainstream of society, politics and economics. They are also oppressed and exploited, both in the workplace and domestically.
Fifteen, important social and economic activities like sports and tourism are badly mismanaged and underdeveloped.
Graphic, empirical or quantitative evidence strongly supports all of the above assertions. Nigeria’s nearly one million square kilometers of land has more than 60 percent of it cultivable for a variety of soil and vegetation determined crop as well as livestock production. Nigeria’s coastal and inland water bodies are an additional asset. In addition to being the eighth producer of oil and containing the sixth deposits of gas worldwide, Nigeria has 44 exportable commodities and 34 solid minerals. The country’s estimated 151 people (from about 400 ethnic nationalities and mainly Christian or Muslim or traditional African religions) potentially make it the largest market in Africa. (Northern Union, 2007).

Despite these tremendous  resources,  Nigeria’s development  has been negated by poor leadership, corruption and attendant poverty incidence ( that is number of those  spending  less than one United States dollar a day) which has risen from 27 percent in 1980 to 65  percent in 1996. This has become the subject of contention between international data sources (70 percent) and local Nigerian estimates (56 percent) more recently. Poverty incidence is also assessed on the basis of educational performance and literacy, general health indicators and services, food security and safety as well as safe drinking water, and life expectancy. Viewed as a whole, therefore on the basis of those indicators that determine whether states succeed of fail, Nigeria has fared badly (Northern Union, 2007).
According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in its Human Development Report for 2009, Human Development Index (HDI) scores have increased in all regions in the world progressively. HDI provides a more complete picture of a country’s development than other indicators like GDP, according to UNDP. HDI looks mainly at human development from life expectancy, adult literacy, purchasing power parity (PPP) and mainly human development indicators. And these have been Nigeria’s scores in recent years, according to the report: Life expectancy – 47.7 percent; adult literacy rate (percentage of age 15 and above)- 72 percent; and GDP per capital, that is PPP US$ 1, 969, all for the year 2007.
Additional worrisome data include the possible loss of about US$ 510 billion from Nigeria’s wealth due to corruption, from 1960 to date, based on analysis and estimates by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Other data are that out of 100 universities in Africa, only seven Nigerian universities  are included as among the best 100 in Africa, with  the best, University of Ilorin, ranked at 55. The same seven universities make the global list at the ranking of University of Ilorin -5484; Obafemi Awolowo University – 5,756; University of Jos; 5,882; University of Lagos- 5,936; University of Benin- 6,324; University of Ibadan – 6,425; and University of Nigeria – 7,170 (Eze, 2011).

Also Nigeria’s HDI rating of 157 out of 177 countries for 2007/2008 and its position on the failed state index of 15 out of 177 states likely to fail by the Fund for Peace in 2009 are not encouraging of its progress towards a successful state that can guarantee the well being of its citizens. Then most recently, out of 100 “best” countries in the world, as determined by Newsweek magazine, in its August 23 and 30, 2011 edition and based on certain criteria, Nigeria is placed 99th just before Burkina Faso at 100. This is a poor showing for the “Giant of Africa”, which is beaten by the following African countries in a descending order: Tunisia, Morocco, Egypt, Botswana, South Africa, Algeria, Ghana, Kenya, Senegal, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Uganda, Zambia and Cameroon.

A critical presentation of the state of Nigeria at 51 as done here is not a damning or pessimistic attack on a hated social formation. The reality is that patriotic Nigerians and friends of Nigeria must first of all accept that there is a problem with Nigeria before devising ways of helping the country.
In this presentation, the point being made is that Nigeria is a country of great potentials, but Nigeria also has serious problems which can be effectively addressed. It is like the rebranding project of Nigeria’s Federal Ministry of Information and Communication. That project must accept that rebranding has to address negative aspects of Nigeria and Nigerians as the basis for correctional action leading logically to rebranding.

Nigeria should not be underperforming or failing the way it is doing right now.  Certain general principles are applicable to failing of failed states. According to Ghani and Lockhart (2009):
“Forty to sixty states, home to nearly two billion people, are either sliding backward and teetering on the brink of implosion or have already collapsed. While one half of the globe has created an almost seamless web of political, financial and technological connections that underpin democratic states and market-based economies, the other half is blocked from political stability and participation in global wealth. Within these countries, vicious networks of criminality, violence and drugs feed on disenfranchised populations and uncontrolled territory. In a period of unprecedented wealth and invention, people throughout Africa, Central Asia, Latin America and the Middle East are locked into lives of misery without a stake in their countries or any certainty about or control over their futures.”(Ghani and Lockhart, 2009: 3).

They conclude that the world today is an open moment with new possibilities of interpreting and doing things, and this opportunity has been provided by the era of globalization. And this era is built on the following characteristics:
   “The emergence of world religions, the nation-state, the industrial revolution, the Great Depression, the end of World War II, the end of Communism, and the emergence of the Internet all marked a rupture between one era and the next.” (Ghani and Lockhart, 2009:231)

To be able to become one of the top 20 economies in the world, Nigeria has to be seen to be making progress in that direction. However let us consider , for example, progress towards realizing the MDGs, as captured in their 2005 report and as more or less confirmed by more  recent tracking of MDGs performance in Nigeria.  It is that instead of achieving 21.4  percent  poverty reduction by 2015,it  would be 43 percent . Within the 15-24 years age bracket, literacy rate has been declining rather than increasing. Gender equality in terms of primary school enrolment has been consistently higher for boys. Infant mortality rate has been increasing, and there is no indication of significant improvement in the maternal mortality rate.
Happily, HIV/AIDS prevalence has been decreasing. Environmental challenges persist, causing social conflicts. Global partnerships need to be enhanced, especially against the confessions by John Perkins (2005), the economic hitman. There is also the Goldman Sachs’ growth environment score based on macroeconomic stability and conditions, technology, human well-being, and political conditions to make the 20 largest economies in 2025 in descending order: US, China, Japan, Germany, India, UK, France, Russia, Korea,  Italy, Mexico, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Turkey, Iran, Vietnam, Pakistan, Philippians, Nigeria, Egypt, and Bangladesh, or  in 2051: China, US, India, Japan, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Germany, UK, France, Indonesia, Nigeria. Korea, Italy, Canada, Vietnam, Turkey, Philippines, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran and Bangladesh

On the basis of the foregoing it is useful to examine the broad global regional and national policy frameworks within which Nigeria’s development can be restored and enhanced. To be sure, the problems of national development in Nigeria have not been due to the lack of or absence of policy but more from poor implementation and inconsistency. For example, the approaches of the  earlier planned development years were jettisoned for free market policies like the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP),which tremendously confused the system for which a lesson could have been learned from planned marketization in China.

Conceptually, in addition to infrastructure and services, Dudley Seers’ explanation of the meaning of development which must address, food, employment, equality and implicitly democracy (Seers, 1969) and Amartya Sen’s idea of development as freedom, with the five areas of: economic facilities, transparency guarantees, social opportunities, political freedom and protective security (Sen, 2004) in addition to established policy positions, provide  the philosophies that can help refashion the progress of Nigeria. In ideological terms, neo-liberal or conservative policies cannot save Nigeria because of their narrowly growth-oriented focus.
To understand this, we need to go back to the general divide in conceptualizing development since the 20th century, between socialism (communism) and capitalism and the development pathways adopted by different countries.
Denis Goulet identified four major historical pathways: one, the growth approach as in capitalist Asia and Brazil; two, the redistribution with growth as in the case of Algeria; three, the basic human needs approach as in Maoist  China; and four, the development from tradition approach as in Sri Lanka ( Ceylon) (Sen, 2008).
The concept of “another development” became popular at some point because of its attributes, summarized as follows: one, orientation towards basic and human needs; two, development from below; three, self-reliance; and four, appropriate technology (Sen, 2008).

The hegemony of corruption has too completely enveloped Nigeria, for salvation from right wing policies. The apparently inevitable solution could be a revolutionary socialist reconstruction of the society.
However, within the possibilities that liberal democracy has to offer, and based on the principles of “another development”, it would be a strong social democratic direction that could introduce capital punishment for corruption, for example, and set about to legislate against the vices that are distorting the country’s development. The perennial concerns about the interplay of the state, the market and  society, discussed by Lindblom (1977) continues and every country must find the correct mix that works for it, recalling, of course, the contest between the pro-market Washington Consensus and the market-critical Santiago Consensus.
Before looking at Nigeria’s development prospects, Box 2 provides some basic indicators of selected African countries, including Nigeria.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s